Alexy, Robert (2002). The Argument from Injustice (Bonnie Litschewski Paulson & Stanley L. Paulson, trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barzun, Jacques (2000). From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present. New York: HarperCollins.
Bix, Brian (1996). Jules Coleman, Legal Positivism, and Legal Authority. Quinnipiac Law Review, vol. 16: 241-254.
Bix, Brian (2006). Legal Positivism and ‘Explaining’ Normativity and Authority. American Philosophical Association Newsletter, vol. 5(2): 5-9.
Bix, Brian (2012). The Nature of Law and Reasons for Action. Problema, vol. 5: 399-415.
Bix, Brian (2013). Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory. In J. Ferrer Beltràn, J. J. Moreso & D. M. Papayannis (eds.), Neutrality and Theory in Law (pp. 33-47). Dordrecht: Springer.
Coleman, Jules L. & Leiter, Brian (2010). Legal Positivism. In D. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 2nd ed. (pp. 228-248). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dworkin, Ronald (1996). Justice in Robes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Edmundson, William A. (2004). State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law. Legal Theory, vol. 10: 215-259.
Enoch, David (2011). Reason-Giving and the Law. In L. Green & B. Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, vol. I (pp. 1-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finnis, John (2011a). Natural Law & Natural Rights, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finnis, John (2011b). Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. IV. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finnis, John (2011c). Reason in Action: Collected Essays, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finnis, John (2013). Reflections and Responses. In J. Keown & R. P. George (eds.), Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis (pp. 459-584). Oxford: Oxford University.
Gardner, J. (2012). Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, Leslie (2003). Legal Positivism. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-positivism.
Greenberg, M. (2011). The Standard Picture and Its Discontents. In L. Green & B. Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, vol. I (pp. 39-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, Mark (2014). The Moral Impact Theory of Law. Yale Law Journal, vol. 123: 1288-1342.
Greenberg, Mark (2017). The Moral Impact Theory, the Dependence View and Natural Law. In G. Duke & R. P. George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence (pp. 275-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals”. Harvard Law Review, vol. 71: 593-629.
Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartney, Michael (1991). Introduction: The Final Form of The Pure Theory of Law. In Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Norms (pp. Ix-lx). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Higgins, Ruth C. A. (2004). The Moral Limits of Law: Obedience, Respect, and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Himma, Kenneth Einar (2002). Inclusive Legal Positivism. In J.Coleman & S. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (pp. 125-165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, David (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature (analytical index by L. A. Selby-Bigge; 2nd ed., with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hurd, Heidi M. (1991). Challenging Authority. Yale Law Journal, vol. 100: 1611-1677.
Jakab, András (2007). Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, vol. 20(1): 35-67.
Kelsen, Hans (1941). The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, vol. 55: 44-70.
Kelsen, Hans (1960a). Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd ed. Vienna: Deuticke.
Kelsen, Hans (1960b). What is the Pure Theory of Law? Tulane Law Review, vol. 34: 269-276.
Kelsen, Hans (1965). Professor Stone and the Pure Theory of Law. Stanford Law Review, vol. 17: 1128-1157.
Kelsen, Hans (1967). Pure Theory of Law (trans. by M. Knight). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kelsen, Hans (1982). The Concept of the Legal Order American Journal of Jurisprudence, vol. 27: 64-84 (trans. by S. L. Paulson).
Kelsen, Hans (1991), General Theory of Norms (trans. by M. Hartney). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, Hans (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (trans. of 1934 1st edition of Reine Rechtslehre by B. Litschewski Paulson & S. L. Paulson). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kelsen, Hans (2006). General Theory of Law and State, reprint of 1949 ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Kelsen, Hans (2013). A ‘Realistic’ Theory of Law and the Pure Theory of Law: Remarks on Alf Ross’s On Law and Justice. In L. Duarte d’Almeida, J. Gardner & L. Green (eds.), Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (pp. 195-221). Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.
Kramer, Matthew (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. C. [Alasdair] (1959). Hume on ‘Is’ and ‘Ought’. The Philosophical Review, vol. 68: 451-468.
Marmor, Andrei (2007). Law in the Age of Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paulson, Stanley L. (1992a). Kelsen’s Legal Theory: The Final Round. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 12: 265-274.
Paulson, Stanley L. (1992b). The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 12: 311-332.
Paulson, Stanley L. (1992c). Supplementary Notes. In Hans Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Paulson, Stanley L. (1998). Four Phases in Hans Kelsen’s Legal Theory? Reflections on a Periodization. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 18: 153-166.
Paulson, Stanley L. (1999). Arriving at a Defensible Periodization of Hans Kelsen’s Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 19: 351-364.
Paulson, Stanley L. (2000). On Transcendental Arguments, Their Recasting in Terms of Belief, and the Ensuing Transformation of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 75: 1775-1795.
Paulson, Stanley L. (2012). A ‘Justified Normativity’ Thesis in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law? Rejoinders to Robert Alexy and Joseph Raz. In Matthias Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (pp. 61-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paulson, Stanley L. (2013). A Great Puzzle: Kelsen’s Basic Norm. In L. Duarte d’Almeida, J. Gardner & L. Green (eds.), Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (pp. 43-61). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Paulson, Stanley L. (2017). Metamorphosis in Hans Kelsen’s Legal Philosophy. Modern Law Review, vol. 80: 860-894.
Paulson, Stanley L. & Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski (eds.) (1998). Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Quinn, Philip L. (1990). The Recent Revival of Divine Command Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, Supplement: 345-365.
Raz, Joseph (1990). Practical Reason and Norms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raz, Joseph (1994). Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Raz, Joseph (1999). Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, Joseph (2009). The Authority of Law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas M. (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schauer, Frederick (1998). Positivism Through Thick and Thin. In B. Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law. New Essays in Legal Theory (pp. 65-78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schauer, Frederick (2010). Was Austin Right After All?: On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law. Ratio Juris, vol. 23: 1-21.
Searle, John (1964). How to Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is’. Philosophical Review, vol. 73: 43-58.
Simpson, A. W. B. (1973). The Common Law and Legal Theory. In A. W. B. Simpson (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (pp. 77-99). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Smith, M. B. E. (1973). Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? Yale Law Journal, vol. 82: 950-976.
Tyler, Tom R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1980). The Case for a Duty to Rescue. Yale Law Journal, vol. 80: 247- 293.
Winston, Kenneth I. (1988). Is/Ought Redux: The Pragmatist Context of Lon Fuller's Conception of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 8: 329-349.